Author Affiliations Article Information
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(12):1501-1508. doi:10.1001/archinte.161.12.1501
Background Data are limited on blood pressure (BP) in young adults and long-term mortality. Moreover, screening and hypertension treatment guidelines have been based mainly on findings for middle-aged and older populations. This study assesses relationships of BP measured in young adult men to long-term mortality due to coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and all causes.
Methods This cohort from the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry included 10 874 men aged 18 to 39 years at baseline (1967-1973), not receiving antihypertensive drugs, and without CHD or diabetes. Relationship of baseline BP to 25-year CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality was assessed.
Results Age-adjusted association of systolic BP to CHD mortality was continuous and graded. Multivariate-adjusted CHD hazard ratios (HRs) for 1 SD higher systolic BP (15 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (10 mm Hg) were 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.44) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.01-1.35), respectively. Compared with the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure stratum with normal BP (and lowest mortality rates), the large strata with high-normal BP and stage 1 hypertension had 25-year absolute risks for death of 63 and 72 per 1000, respectively, and absolute excess risks of 10 and 20 per 1000, respectively; accounted for 59.8% of all excess CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality; and were estimated to have life expectancy shortened by 2.2 and 4.1 years, respectively.
Conclusions In young adult men, BP above normal was significantly related to increased long-term mortality due to CHD, CVD, and all causes. Population-wide primary prevention, early detection, and control of higher BP are indicated from young adulthood on.
FOR MIDDLE-AGED and older populations worldwide, blood pressure (BP) has repeatedly been shown to be a significant risk factor for the major cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.1-6 For systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), these relationships are continuous, graded, independent of other risk factors, consistent, predictive, and generally assessed as etiologically significant. Data indicate that SBP is a stronger predictor than DBP at these ages.7-10
In contrast, long-term observations of BP and mortality due to CHD and CVD in young adults are limited. Because major CVD events are rare before 50 years of age in men and 60 years of age in women, studies on risk factors measured at an average age of about 30 years require long-term follow-up or large sample sizes to accrue adequate numbers of events. The few reports of prospective population-based studies are from nested case-control investigations in former college students11-13 and analyses of life insurance actuarial data.14-16 Other evidence comes from autopsy studies showing that coronary risk factors relate to early atherosclerotic lesions in young adults.17-19 Although hypertension treatment guidelines are usually considered applicable for persons aged 18 years and older,20,21 there is limited documentation supporting screening and treatment of young adults.
This report adds information on this matter. The Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry (CHA) Study is one of the largest and longest prospective studies providing CVD mortality data. Approximately 11 000 men aged 18 to 39 years at baseline were followed up for an average of 25 years. The goals of this research were to determine (1) whether SBP, DBP, and SBP/DBP categories of the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI)20 predict long-term mortality due to CHD, CVD, and all causes for young men; (2) whether SBP is a better predictor than DBP in young men; and (3) long-term absolute risks, absolute excess risks, and impairment of life expectancy in young men with higher BP, with comparison of risks in young and middle-aged men.
Methods of the CHA study have been described.22,23 Briefly, 39 573 men and women aged 18 years and older underwent screening from November 1967 through January 1973. All employees at 84 cooperating Chicago-area companies and organizations, with a labor force of approximately 75 000 people, were invited to participate; volunteer rate was 53%.
Screening was performed by 2 trained and standardized 4-person field teams. Data collected at baseline included age, sex, ethnicity, education, BP, serum total cholesterol level, smoking status, height and weight, resting electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, medical history, and current treatment for chronic diseases, including hypertension and diabetes. A single casual supine BP measurement was obtained by trained staff using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer. Standardized high-quality methods were used for determination of total serum cholesterol levels.24 Criteria of the National Cooperative Pooling Project and the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program were used to code ECG abnormalities.25
Mortality end points
Vital status was ascertained through 1995, with average follow-up of 25 years. Deaths were determined before and including 1979 by means of direct mail, telephone, contact with employer, and matching of cohort records with Social Security Administration files, and after 1979 by means of matching of study records with National Death Index records. Multiple causes of death from death certificates were coded by trained research staff according to the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8).26 Coding decisions were cross-checked by study team members. All coders were blinded to baseline data. For this report, underlying cause of death was used. Mortality due to CHD was defined as ICD-8 codes 410.0 to 414.9; that due to CVD, ICD-8 codes 400.0 to 445.9.
Men aged 18 to 39 years at baseline numbered 11 248. Of these, 374 were excluded for the following reasons: data missing at baseline or on follow-up (n = 114); baseline ECG evidence of myocardial infarction (n = 5); history of myocardial infarction or other CHD (n = 12); antihypertensive drug treatment at baseline (n = 125); or previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus (n = 118). Thus, this report is based on 10 874 men.
Age-adjusted mortality rates per 10 000 person-years of follow-up and per 1000 men were computed for CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality. Mortality rates were calculated by categories of SBP or DBP and by the following classification according to the JNC-VI20: optimal (SBP of 120 mm Hg and DBP of 80 mm Hg); normal not optimal (SBP of 120-129 mm Hg and DBP of 85 mm Hg, or SBP of 130 mm Hg and DBP of 80-84 mm Hg); high normal (SBP of 130-139 mm Hg and DBP of 90 mm Hg, or SBP of 140 mm Hg and DBP of 85-89 mm Hg); stage 1 hypertension (SBP of 140-159 mm Hg and DBP of 100 mm Hg, or SBP of 160 mm Hg and DBP of 90-99 mm Hg); stage 2 hypertension (SBP of 160-179 mm Hg and DBP of 110 mm Hg, or SBP of 180 mm Hg and DBP of 100-109 mm Hg); and stage 3 hypertension (SBP of 180 mm Hg or DBP of 110 mm Hg). Rates were age adjusted by the direct method to the overall cohort age distribution.
Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of death and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for baseline BP categories, and to obtain multivariate-adjusted coefficients for the relation of BP to mortality. The HRs were adjusted for age (years), race (African American or not), education (years), serum total cholesterol level (millimoles per liter [milligrams per deciliter]), cigarette smoking (cigarettes/day), body mass index (BMI) (weight in kilograms divided by square of height in meters), BMI2, and any ECG abnormality (no or yes).
Absolute excess death rates per 1000 in 25 years by JNC-VI stratum were calculated from age-adjusted mortality rates per 1000 in 25 years. The reference group was the stratum with normal (not optimal) BP. Numbers of excess deaths for other JNC-VI strata were calculated from these absolute excess rates and numbers of men in these strata. Percentage of all excess deaths in each stratum was also calculated.
Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression coefficients for the relation of JNC-VI strata to all-cause mortality were used to estimate years of shorter life expectancy for men with higher baseline BP levels compared with men with normal BP. Detailed methods for these calculations have been described elsewhere.23,27
Table 1 presents data on baseline variables. At baseline, 8.6% of the cohort had optimal BP (JNC-VI criteria); 20.2%, normal (not optimal) BP; 25.5%, high-normal BP; and 36.4%, stage 1 hypertension.
Baseline sbp and dbp and mortality
During follow-up, 197 men died of CHD; 257 of CVD; and 759 of all causes.
Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates
With higher SBP, age-adjusted mortality due to CHD and CVD increased continuously and markedly (Table 2). For DBP, mortality due to CHD and CVD was lower for men with DBP of 70 to 79 mm Hg than for those with DBP of less than 70 mm Hg. For strata with DBP of greater than 70 to 79 mm Hg, mortality rates were progressively and markedly higher.
For all-cause mortality, rates were lowest in men with SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg and with DBP of 70 to 79 mm Hg; for strata with higher levels, rates were generally progressively higher.
With SBP of 120 to 129 mm Hg and DBP of 70 to 79 mm Hg as the references, HRs for CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality generally increased with higher SBP and DBP level (Table 2).
For men with DBP of less than 70 mm Hg, HRs were non significantly higher for all 3 end points (1.63, 1.32, and 1.22 for CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality, respectively) compared with men with DBP of 70 to 79 mm Hg.
Cox Multivariate-Adjusted Coefficients
For SBP and DBP, Cox coefficients were statistically significant for all 3 mortality end points (Table 2). For CHD deaths, these coefficients yielded HRs—for 1-SD higher SBP (15.2 mm Hg) and DBP (10.4 mm Hg)—of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.11-1.44) for SBP and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.01-1.35) for DBP. For comparison, these estimates for the CHA cohort of middle-aged men (aged 40-59 years) were 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) for SBP and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.21-1.38) for DBP (coefficients 0.0108 and 0.0223; 1 SD, 19.3 mm Hg and 11.5 mm Hg).
Baseline sbp/dbp (jnc-vi criteria) and long-term mortality
Age-adjusted death rates and multivariate-adjusted HRs were lowest for the normal (but not optimal) stratum (Table 3). Adjusted rates and HRs increased progressively for strata above normal BP, eg, CHD HRs of 1.37 for the high-normal stratum and of 1.62, 2.51, and 3.60 for hypertension stages 1, 2, and 3 strata, respectively, compared with the normal stratum.
HRs in Men With Optimal BP
For men with optimal BP, risks were relatively (non significantly) higher for CHD, CVD, and all causes than for those with normal BP (Table 3). As mentioned in JNC-V and JNC-VI guidelines on optimal BP, unusually low BP readings need clinical evaluation.20,28 For men with optimal BP in this cohort, 45 deaths (of 59 due to all causes) were attributed to non cardiovascular causes, and about half of these deaths were due to neoplasms (Table 4). In a further analysis, age-adjusted rates for CHD and CVD for men with optimal BP were equal to or lower than those for men with normal BP (Table 5). Multivariate-adjusted HRs, particularly for CHD and CVD, were lower than those in Table 3, ie, 1.08 (CHD), 1.06 (CVD), and 1.24 (all causes). With exclusion also of men with DBP of 60 to 64 mm Hg, HR for all causes was reduced to 1.15 (95% CI, 0.79-1.68) (detailed data not shown).
Absolute excess risks and excess deaths by jnc-vi bp classification
Absolute excess risks for CVD death were 6.3, 10.8, 33.1, and 74.1 per 1000 in 25 years for men with high-normal BP and stages 1, 2, and 3 hypertension, respectively (Table 6). For all-cause death, absolute excess risks ranged from 10.1 to 107.6 per 1000 in 25 years. For men with higher BP levels, ie, high-normal BP and stages 1, 2, and 3 hypertension, estimated life expectancy was shorter by 2.2, 4.1, 8.4, and 12.2 years, respectively, compared with men with normal BP.23,27
For each mortality end point, the highest proportion of all excess deaths—41.6% to 45.6%—was in the large stratum (3963 of the 10 874 men) with stage 1 hypertension (Table 6). Of all excess deaths, 15.6% to 16.9% were in the sizable high-normal stratum (2773 men), more than in the small stratum (161 men) with stage 3 hypertension. Together, the high-normal and stage 1 hypertensive strata accounted for 58.5% of excess CVD deaths and 59.4% of excess deaths due to all causes.
The main findings on this cohort of young adult employed men are as follows. (1) Even at their age (average, 30 years), SBP/DBP at optimal or normal levels prevailed in only 28.8% (8.6% + 20.2%), whereas (2) SBP/DBP was high-normal or stage 1 hypertension in 61.9% (25.5% + 36.4%). These findings almost certainly reflect the adverse impact of dietary and other lifestyle traits leading to BP rise from youth onward in most people (eg, on average the cohort was overweight [BMI, 26.0]). (3) Blood pressure measured in young adulthood predicted long-term risks for CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality. As in middle-aged and older persons,1-6 relationships of SBP, DBP, and SBP/DBP (JNC-VI strata) to mortality were generally graded, strong, and independent. (4) Multivariate-adjusted HRs tended to be greater for SBP than DBP, and similar in size to those for middle-aged men. (5) For the 2 large strata with high-normal BP and stage 1 hypertension, 25-year absolute risks and absolute excess risks for mortality—for the years from average ages of 30 to 55 years—were substantial, eg, all-cause mortality rates of 63 and 72 per 1000 and absolute excess rates of 10 and 20 per 1000, translating into estimated shorter life expectancy of 2.2 and 4.1 years. These 2 strata accounted for 59.4% of all excess deaths attributable to above-normal SBP/DBP.
Observations on BP and CHD or total CVD mortality in young adults are limited, mainly because elucidation of this matter requires large sample sizes and long-term follow-up to accrue sufficient events for statistical analysis. In the 1960s, Paffenbarger et al11-13 reported nested case-control investigations of 45 000 college entrants (average age, 19 years) from the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University examined from 1921 through 1950. They demonstrated that higher percentages of those who died of CHD and stroke had higher SBP ( 130 mm Hg) at entry examination. However, analyses of BP and mortality were not multivariate adjusted, and detailed relations by BP strata were not investigated. Other long-term cohort studies have investigated cardiovascular risk factors in young adults on a smaller scale. Thirty-year follow-up data on Framingham Study participants aged 31 to 39 years at baseline did not provide results on blood pressure29; 14- and 18-year follow-up reports on Framingham young adults combined participants aged 30 to 49 years.7,30 The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study on almost 1000 young male medical students (mean age, 22 years) reported 30-year CVD mortality in relation to serum cholesterol levels31 and vascular reactivity,32 but these reports gave no data on blood pressure and subsequent CVD events. Investigations by the Society of Actuaries yielded detailed findings on BP levels at entry and all-cause mortality among approximately 4 million entrants aged 15 to 69 years.14-16 These large-scale data showed continuous and graded relationships of SBP/DBP to mortality in entrants aged 20 to 29 and 30 to 39 years, but the data were not multivariate adjusted and may have limitations related to accuracy of BP measurement in insurance examinations. Recently, a study from Glasgow, Scotland, briefly reported a significant relationship between SBP in university students and subsequent CVD mortality, but detailed relations by BP strata were not given.33 Thus, our data go beyond the few previous findings and constitute, to our knowledge, the first detailed report from a large, long-term study of young adults from the general population showing a significant independent association of BP level and CHD or CVD mortality.
Advanced coronary atherosclerosis was seen in most young American men undergoing autopsy during the Korean and Vietnam wars.34,35 Other studies of the natural history of atherosclerosis indicate that in populations with high rates of premature coronary artery disease, advanced lesions appear with increasing frequency during the years of childhood and young adulthood.36 In autopsy studies from the Bogalusa Heart Study, among children and young adults who died prematurely of non cardiac causes, the extent of involvement of aortic and coronary artery wall with fatty streaks and fibrous plaques was associated with major coronary risk factors, including BP.17,18 Another autopsy study of youth showed a relation of coronary atherosclerosis to an index of mean arterial pressure based on findings in small renal arteries.19 Correspondingly, a recent report on electron-beam computed tomography showed that, in young adults, BP related to presence of coronary artery calcification.37 It is reasonable to interpret our data as concordant, ie, indicating that such BP-related early atherosclerotic lesions lead to greater risk for fatal CVD during the decades from young adulthood through middle age.
Our data indicate that SBP may be more useful in predicting future CHD and CVD deaths than DBP. Risk generally increased throughout the range of SBP from 120 to 180 mm Hg and above. This finding for young adults lends support to recent assessments, based on data for older adults, that SBP might be more important than DBP and that both (SBP/DBP) merit consideration in assessment of CVD risk.7-10
Although not statistically significant, our data on low DBP ( 70 mm Hg) suggest it may be related to increased long-term CHD, CVD, and all-cause mortality and that low SBP ( 120 mm Hg) may be related to increased all-cause mortality. These results should be interpreted with caution for several reasons. First, HRs were not significant and 95% CIs were wide, given small numbers of CHD and CVD deaths in these categories. Second, as footnoted in the BP classification of JNC-V and JNC-VI,20,28 people with very low BP, especially very low DBP, may have medical abnormalities, eg, aortic insufficiency or preclinical neoplastic disease, hence needing medical evaluation. We could not completely exclude men with medical conditions. After exclusion of those with low DBP ( 60 mm Hg, also 65 mm Hg), risks for CHD and CVD mortality in the optimal and normal BP strata were almost identical. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that these data do not critically bring into question the conclusion that the relationship between SBP/DBP and CVD risks is generally continuous (monotonic), and that for healthy adults, including young as well as older adults, SBP/DBP of less than 120/80 mm Hg ( 120/ 80 mm Hg) or of less than or equal to 120/80 mm Hg ( 120/ 80 mm Hg) is optimal.
A limitation of the present study is that results were based on a single measurement of blood pressure, hence, they probably underestimate true associations because of regression dilution bias.1 Nonetheless, as shown here and in many other prospective population studies, a single BP reading is strongly predictive of future CVD events. Since this cohort was identified at employment sites, the role of the "healthy worker effect" should be considered, ie, because working populations tend to be healthier than general populations, the mortality rate of the CHA cohort was about 30% lower than that expected for a similar sample of the general population. However, this phenomenon has little or no bearing qualitatively on the relation of baseline risk factors (including BP) to long-term mortality, as shown by many prospective studies with similar qualitative results on this matter for workplace-based and community-based populations samples.1,2 It is possible that because of this phenomenon, our study quantitatively underestimates absolute risk and absolute excess risks of adverse blood pressure levels for young adult men. Thus, it is a reasonable inference, supported by the limited data available from other studies of young adults, that these findings are generalizable.
Our results indicate that levels of blood pressure above normal in young adults is a large unsolved problem for medical care and public health. Long-term absolute risks and absolute excess risks, ie, from average age of 30 years at baseline to 55 years, were substantial for these young adult men, making up 61.9% of this cohort, with 59.4% of all excess deaths in men with high-normal BP and stage 1 hypertension.
These data lend strong support to 2 strategic concepts. First population-wide primary prevention by safe nutritional-hygienic means of adverse BP levels, highly prevalent at present in middle-aged and older people, is important. With such primary prevention, a substantial increase can be achieved in the proportion of people in the population who throughout life have favorable levels of BP (and other risk factors). Second, population-wide efforts should be made for early detection of children, teenagers, young adults, and others with unfavorable BP levels, so that therapeutic efforts can be instituted early, first and foremost to improve lifestyles. Initial lifestyle recommendations to prevent and treat high BP involved avoidance of high levels of salt intake, inadequate potassium intake, excess alcohol use, overweight, and sedentary habit.38-40 Based on recent research advances, these recommendations have been expanded to include high intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes; fat-free and low-fat protein sources; and low intake of lipid-rich foods (ie, reduced dietary total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol) and sweets.20,41-43
Our results also support recommendations by JNC-VI on dealing with risks for persons aged 18 years and older with high BP. Because our study was observational, not interventional, it yielded no direct data related to treatment of high BP in young adults by lifestyle and (as indicated) pharmacological means. For hypertensive men of this age, there are no clinical trial data, no trials on-going, and to the best of our knowledge none planned, because sample size and duration are forbidding. Therefore, use of drugs for this age group must rely on judgment concerning the likely mix of benefit and risk with decades-long treatment. Our data are important evidence on risks; they reinforce JNC-VI recommendations to base drug (along with lifestyle) treatment on BP levels, findings for other risk factors and for target organ damage, and response to initial lifestyle intervention, and not on age.
In conclusion, the data of this study on young adult men underscore the soundness of recommendations for population-wide lifestyle modifications to prevent adverse BP levels, population-wide efforts for early detection and lifestyle counseling for those who already have unfavorable BP levels, and, for those with frank high BP at any adult age, implementation of JNC-VI guidelines for treatment.
Accepted for publication November 7, 2000.
The Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry has been supported by the American Heart Association and its Chicago and Illinois affiliates, Chicago, Ill; the Illinois Regional Medical Program, Chicago; grant HL21010 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md; the Chicago Health Research Foundation, Chicago; and private donors.
Presented at the 18th Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Hypertension, Chicago, Ill, August 23, 2000.
The work of the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study was accomplished thanks to the invaluable cooperation of 84 Chicago companies and organizations and their officers, staff, and employees, whose volunteer efforts made the project possible. Acknowledgment is also gratefully extended to all those in the Chicago Heart Association—staff and volunteers—serving the project. Many of these individuals are cited by name in Stamler et al.22,23
Corresponding author and reprints: Martha L. Daviglus, MD, PhD, Northwestern University Medical School, Department of Preventive Medicine, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Suite 1102, Chicago, IL 60611-4402 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
1. MacMahon SPeto RCutler J et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease, I: prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990;335765- 774Google ScholarCrossref
2. Stamler JStamler RNeaton D Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks: US population data. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153598- 615
3. Kannel WB Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment. JAMA. 1996;2751571- 1576
5. Fiebach NHHebert PRStampfer MJ et al. A prospective study of high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130646- 654Google Scholar
6. Keil JESutherland SEKnapp RGLackland DTGazes PCTyroler HA Mortality rates and risk factors for coronary disease in black as compared with white men and women. N Engl J Med. 1993;32973- 78Google ScholarCrossref
11. Paffenbarger RSNotkin JKrueger DE et al. Chronic disease in former college students, II: methods of study and observations on mortality from coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health. 1966;56962- 971Google ScholarCrossref
13. Paffenbarger RSWing AL Chronic disease in former college students, X: the effects of single and multiple characteristics on risk of fatal coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1969;90527- 535Google Scholar
14. Society of Actuaries, Build and Blood Pressure Study 1959. New York, NY Peter F Mallon Inc1959;
15. Society of Actuaries and Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America, Blood Pressure Study 1979. Chicago, Ill Society of Actuaries and Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America1980;
16. Lew EA Blood pressure and mortality: life insurance experience. Stamler JStamler RPullman TNeds. The Epidemiology of Hypertension. New York, NY Grune & Stratton Inc1967;392- 397Google Scholar
17. Berenson GSSrinivasan SRBao WNewman III WPTracy REWattigney WABogalusa Heart Study, Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 1998;3381650- 1656Google ScholarCrossref
18. Newman III WPFreedman DSVoors AW et al. Relation of serum lipoprotein levels and systolic blood pressure to early atherosclerosis: the Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1986;314138- 144Google ScholarCrossref
19. McGill HCMcMahan CATracy RE et al. Pathological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group, Relation of a postmortem renal index of hypertension to atherosclerosis and coronary artery size in young men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;181108- 1118Google ScholarCrossref
20. The Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, The sixth report of the Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;1572413- 2445
21. The Guidelines Subcommittee of the World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee, 1999 World Heath Organization–International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999;17151- 183Google Scholar
22. Stamler JRhomberg PSchoenberger JA et al. Multivariate analysis of the relationship of seven variables to blood pressure: findings of the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry, 1967-1972. J Chronic Dis. 1975;28527- 548Google ScholarCrossref
23. Stamler JDyer ARShekelle RBNeaton JStamler R Relationship of baseline major risk factors to coronary and all-cause mortality, and to longevity: findings from long-term follow-up of Chicago cohorts. Cardiology. 1993;82191- 222Google ScholarCrossref
24. Stamler JStamler RRhomberg P et al. Multivariate analysis of the relationship of six variables to blood pressure: findings from Chicago Community Surveys, 1965-1971. J Chronic Dis. 1975;28499- 525Google ScholarCrossref
25. Liao YLiu KDyer A et al. Major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes in men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;121494- 1500Google ScholarCrossref
26. National Center for Health Statistics, International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision, Adapted for Use in the United States. Washington, DC National Center for Health Statistics, Public Health Service, US Dept of Health Education and Welfare1967;PHS publication 1693
27. Stamler JStamler RNeaton JD et al. Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy: findings for 5 large cohorts of young adult and middle-aged men and women. JAMA. 1999;2822012- 2018
28. The Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, The fifth report of the Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med. 1993;153154- 183
29. Anderson KMCastelli WPLevy D Cholesterol and mortality: 30 years of follow-up from the Framingham Study. JAMA. 1987;2572176- 2180
30. Dawber TR Risk factors in young adults: the lessons from epidemiologic studies of cardiovascular disease: Framingham, Tecumseh, and Evans County. J Am Coll Health. 1973;2284- 95Google Scholar
34. Enos WFHolmes RHBeyer J Coronary disease among United States soldiers killed in action in Korea: preliminary report. JAMA. 1953;1521090- 1093
35. McNamara JJMolot MAStremple JFCutting RT Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA. 1971;2161185- 1187
36. Tejada CStrong JPMontenegro MRRestrepo CSolberg LA Distribution of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis by geographic location, race, and sex. Lab Invest. 1968;18509- 526Google Scholar
37. Mahoney LTBurns TLStanford W et al. Coronary risk factors measured in childhood and young adult life are associated with coronary artery calcification in young adults: the Muscatine Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27277- 284Google ScholarCrossref
38. Stamler J The INTERSALT Study: background, methods, findings, and implications. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65 ((suppl)) 626S- 642SGoogle Scholar
39. National Research Council Committee on Diet and Health, Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. Washington, DC National Academy Press1989;
40. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on primary prevention of hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153186- 208
41. Stamler J Setting the TONE for ending the hypertension epidemic [editorial]. JAMA. 1998;279878- 879